Reproducible Quantitative Methods

Lesson 9

Making better plots / Academic publishing

yeah bar

Topics and Resources

  1. Plotting in R

    There are several ways we can approach plotting lessons, but I suggest taking your target dataset and plotting it in a variety of ways- scatter plots, box plots (I love box plots), bar graphs, etc. Work with your group to identify what sorts of visualizations make sense- here's some ideas from ggplot2, but there are some inspiring resources written with base R too. The way you do this will depend somewhat on the form your data takes- be sure to take inspiration from the conventions of data presentation in your field. We'll work together interpret the graph at each step, and talk about the advantages and disadvantages of presenting the data each way.


    ProTip


    A helpful hint from those that came before

    Keep it real. It's very rewarding to produce "real" journal quality figures right from your R scripts early in the process. If time permits, create multi-panel figures or add annotations to graphs- and I'm here to help with that- these often trip students up when working on projects solo.

  2. Academic publishing

    This week, we're going to have a special guest lecture by Richard Smith-Unna, who will talk to us about academic publishing, content mining, and how current models of creating scientific output can hinder scientific process. Read this article for some context.

Exercises

  1. Making figures
  2. Work through creating figures, based on your project data. Think about things like color palettes, and what that means for accessibility.

Discussion

Academic publishing

So, how do you decide where to publish? It’s easy to find resources about choosing a journal from a more conventional framework (TL:DR- most of them are some variation of “Choose the journal with the highest impact factor that also fits your work”)- but issues around open access muddies this old advice a bit. This is a really good opportunity to talk about issues with valuing science and scientists by impact factors of journals. We suggest reading High-impact open access journals and Eigenfactor Index of Open Access Fees to get you started. Open access seems simple on the surface, but we get into a very tangled web of corporate interests, biased metrics, and misinformation very quickly.

Videos

How do we rate the quality of scientific work?

What is impact factor? (5:10)

"I can categorically say I hate impact factors!" Nobel Laureate Martin Chalfie (2:52)



Where do open access models fit into this?

Open Access Explained! (8:23)

Understanding Open Access, by Wiley (3:13)

Questions

What do you look for when deciding where to publish? What does your advisor look for?

How can we approach co-authors with differing views on where to publish?

Does impact factor influence where you decide to publish?

What do we want from an open journal?

What constraints do closed-access publishers place, and how do they affect science?

What constraints do for-profit publishers place, and how do they affect science?

Previous Lesson | Home | Next Lesson